How Government Turned Universities and Businesses into DEI Bureaucracies


In recent years, universities and corporations have increasingly adopted Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, often under the influence and pressure of government regulations. This trend has turned many educational institutions and businesses into sprawling DEI bureaucracies, prioritizing diversity metrics over merit and efficiency.

The expansion of DEI programs can be traced back to various government mandates and incentives. These policies encourage or even require organizations to implement extensive DEI measures.

For instance, the federal government has long used affirmative action policies to ensure that colleges and universities prioritize diversity in their admissions processes. These policies often translate into extensive DEI bureaucracies within these institutions, aimed at managing and promoting diversity initiatives.

In the corporate world, the influence of DEI is similarly pervasive. Companies are increasingly required to report on their diversity metrics and demonstrate their commitment to DEI principles. This requirement is often driven by government regulations or by pressure from powerful institutional investors who themselves are influenced by these regulations. The result is a burgeoning DEI industry within corporations, characterized by a significant allocation of resources towards diversity training, reporting, and compliance measures.

One notable example of this phenomenon is the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, which recently announced the redirection of $2.3 million towards DEI efforts. This move underscores the financial burden such initiatives can place on institutions, diverting funds from other critical areas such as research and academic programs.

Critics argue that the emphasis on DEI undermines meritocracy and leads to inefficiencies. They contend that DEI initiatives often prioritize demographic characteristics over qualifications and performance, which can diminish the overall quality and competitiveness of institutions and organizations. Furthermore, the proliferation of DEI bureaucracies introduces additional layers of administrative overhead, contributing to rising costs and bureaucratic inefficiency.

Despite these criticisms, proponents of DEI initiatives argue that they are essential for creating inclusive environments that reflect the diversity of society. They assert that diverse teams bring a variety of perspectives that can enhance creativity and problem-solving. However, the challenge remains in balancing these goals with the need to maintain standards of merit and efficiency.

The growth of DEI bureaucracies is a clear example of how government intervention can reshape organizational priorities. As these initiatives continue to expand, it is crucial to critically assess their impact on the efficiency and effectiveness of universities and businesses. The debate over the role and extent of DEI programs is likely to persist, as stakeholders from various sectors weigh the benefits of diversity against the potential drawbacks of an increasingly bureaucratic approach to achieving it.


  1. Hiring based on anything other than ability, skills, merit, equality and fairness is Bogus and 100% detrimental to America. The someone gets a job based entirely on skin color, race or sexual orientation, etc., is sick, despicable and wrong. Now, educating people who are interested and motivated is generally right, but working toward a goal is not the same as getting a job based solely on the person’s skin color. Sadly, those who get jobs and positions because of their skin color, race and sexual orientation are 99% of the times the very people who harm the innocent due to bias and prejudice. There is no intelligent reason to hire anyone solely based on skin color, race and sexual orientation, aka “diversity”.

  2. C’mon man! socialist want numbers to balance, except the Budget. Skill and ability have nothing to do with outcome. Balance the population employment is all that is necessary. Watch out NBA, see what happened to womans Sports being dominated by low achieving males.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here